Friday, August 21, 2020

Francisco Goya – Saturn Devouring His Son

 


 

Francisco Goya born 1746, died 1828 {aged 82 years} was a Spanish painter. Out of his 14 Black Paintings, Saturn devouring his son stands out. 

 

 

The painting illustrates Saturn eating his sons one by one upon their birth after a prophecy that one of his sons will overthrow him, just as he had overthrown his father.  To prevent this prophecy from coming true, Saturn commences to eat his children moments after each one was born. His third son Jupiter was hidden by his wife on the Greek island of Crete. She misleads Saturn by offering a stone wrapped in a blanket instead of Jupiter. Just as the prophecy had predicted - Saturn was eventually displaced by Jupiter.

 

Goya never took the pain in explaining the meaning of the painting.

 

Experts have interpreted the meaning of the painting as follows:

 

1.Time consumes everything.

2.The anger of God.

3.The clash between old age and youth.

4.The strife leading to political and social issues in Spain during that time when the country obliterates it own citizens during war and revolution.

 

Goya could have been motivated by Peter Paul Rubens {1577-1640} a Flemish Painter.

 Rubens’ painting Saturn or Saturn Devouring His Son was painted in 1636. The Painting is seen as less cannibalistic when compared to Goya’s Painting.

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Mr Samuel Beckett, We're all waiting !

|::| The futility of existence is depicted quite appropriately in the Two-Act play by Samuel Beckett.

|::| Waiting, passing time, moments lost, endless days are major themes where ‘Nothing Ever Happens’.

|::| Guess a mind should know now that this refers to ‘Waiting For Godot’, first premiered on 5th Jan.  1953.


|::| Watching the video version {text practically followed without any modification} directed by Michael Lindsay Hogg (2001) while reading the play simultaneously is highly recommended.

|::| One can’t watch or read this work casually

|::| Sometimes it makes a mind wonder whether those two were ‘Waiting For Godot’, or ‘Waiting For God’ or ‘Waiting For Hope’!

Thursday, March 26, 2020

Miloš Forman

Completed Milos Forman Films :

Jan Tomáš "Miloš" Forman (/ˈmlʃ/; Czech: [ˈmɪloʃ ˈforman]; 18 February 1932 – 13 April 2018) was a Czech-American film director, screenwriter, actor, and professor who rose to fame in his native Czechoslovakia before emigrating to the United States in 1968  {Source : Wikipedia}


(1964) - Black Peter
(1965) - Lásky Jedné Plavovlásky AKA The Loves of a Blonde
(1967) - The Firemen's Ball
(1971) - Taking Off
(1973) - Visions Of Eight (1973) + 7 Others
(1975) - One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest
(1979) - Hair
(1981) - Ragtime
(1984) - Amadeus (Directors Cut)
(1989) - Valmont
(1996) - The People vs Larry Flynt
(1999) - Man On The Moon


 
Miloš Forman












Monday, March 09, 2020

Antonio Gaudi (1984) By Hiroshi Teshigahara



The Japanese documentary  {1984} is a look at Antonio Gaudi’s work by Hiroshi Teshigahara.

More details in :














Sunday, March 08, 2020

Woman in the Dunes - 1964 by Hiroshi Teshigahara.




Woman in the Dunes - 1964 (砂の女, Suna no Onna, "Sand woman") is a Japanese film directed by Hiroshi Teshigahara.





The work slightly reminds one of ‘No Exit’ a 1944 existentialist French play by Jean-Paul Sartre.





It has a nightmarish and bizarre setting in which the protagonist is trapped and squashed by a ridiculously blind authoritarian society.






It’s a very difficult to ‘sit through’ movie. Repeated viewings are necessary in the intermittent phases of life to appreciate this work of art.




Synopsis: An entomologist while catching and observing insects misses the bus back to Tokyo. The villagers offer to help him. Instead he finds himself trapped in a large sand pit with a woman. The woman has accepted her fate and has no desire to get out of the pit. The man at first refuses to accept this as a way of life and attempts to escape in vain the impenetrable wall of sand which is a barrier between him and his ‘freedom.’ In the beginning there is anger, irritation, rage, then helplessness, powerlessness and hopelessness ending with resignation and acceptance of his pointless and doomed fate  – reduced from ‘being to nothingness’!





Ultimately one is left to imagine a wary world without humanity’s dependence on paper qualifications like passports, driving licenses, aadhar cards, pan cards, voters ID, birth certificates, university certificates, medical certificates, etc. to prove our ID, credentials and existence to others.






The movie is open to interpretations. The viewers are left with their own ideas and perspectives. The sand pit may be a symbol of human existence. The man and the woman can be seen as a representation of humanity’s existentialist dilemma. Like Sisyphus who was infinitely predestined to roll a rock to the top of a hill only to have it roll back down again - both the characters dig sand out of the pit only to have it slide back again.






Were they living to clear sand or clearing sand to live?






Call it a Kafkaesque situation, existential environment, Stockholm syndrome or Sisyphus position; it needs patience, philosophical awareness and a lot of reading to appreciate and admire this work.






The film also exposes the western worlds’ ignorance and or prejudices when it comes to showering all the credentials and recognizance to Akira Kurosawa and not acknowledging, overlooking or ignoring Yasujiro Osu, Takahi Miike, Nagisa Oshima, Mikio Naruse, Masaki Kobayashi, Kenji Mizoguchi, Hiroshi Teshigahara amongst others – otherwise this would have been a cult film !